I just finished looking at an audit report for a project. Honestly, it’s not reliable to judge anything just by how many GitHub stars it has. Some repositories get “boosted” in a way that’s just like a micro-merchant’s Moments feed—so sketchy. What I usually do first is check the address for their multi-sig upgrade: how many signers there are, and whether there’s a time lock. Then I’ll also take a look at whether those signers are basically “on the same side” as the project team. A famous audit firm doesn’t mean there aren’t any tricks. Sometimes the report even says things like “There is low risk here, but the team has decided not to fix it”—would you believe that? If I run into something like that, I just pass.

Lately, the whole situation involving miners has been pretty lively too. People have been criticizing MEV and whether transaction ordering is fair nonstop. Retail traders already have to deal with slippage on DEXs, and now they also have to race against the machines. So tell me—does this on-chain “fairness” really hold up as a real proposition? That’s it for now. Once the food’s been cooked, I’m going to tweak the routing parameters.