Just checked out a new chain game project, and its tokenomics is using the same old “dual-currency + infinite emissions” setup. The liquidity pool isn’t even hot yet, but inflation has already arrived. Honestly, it’s kind of interesting: a lot of people focus on daily active users and gold-farming earnings right away, but once the production speed ramps up and consumption can’t keep up, it turns into in-ecosystem players cutting each other. In the end, the more the pool gets mined, the thinner it becomes, and liquidity essentially dries up. In plain terms, the team either didn’t figure out how to close the loop of “production–consumption–token locking,” or they deliberately don’t want to close it. For someone like me who’s slow to react, when I see this kind of thing, I usually stay away first—then circle back after it’s been running for a while to see who’s swimming naked. Recently, AI Agent and automated trading projects have also been pretty active, but when it comes to security, who’s actually investigating? I didn’t get involved—I’m just watching from the sidelines for now.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned