Hilarious—I just checked an old chain-game project I used to ape into, and the pool is almost dry like the Sahara. Basically, the chain gaming economy collapse playbook is pretty much the same: output inflation is raging, the siphoning mechanism can’t keep up, and in the end the gold-farming studios outnumber players. Prices crash hard, and a pile of leftover tokens become basically air.

Data tools keep shouting about “a certain chain-game ecosystem’s activity,” but is that activity real players or just a script army? I’m honestly already fed up whenever I see these “tagging systems.” They slap on labels like “healthy” at the drop of a hat, but the pool gets drained anyway. Do you trust it, or do you trust your own eyes? Better yet, just look at on-chain transfer frequency and pool depth—at least nobody’s lying to you.

Anyway, it’s like this now: don’t chase hot topics, don’t blindly trust data tools. First look at the cost, then look at the output. Chain games, if you put it plainly, are basically a money-burning game of chicken—who runs first wins. That’s it for now, I’m out.