The BTC on-chain ecosystem has made me fully understand that tokens without community support and engagement with the community are doomed to die!!!

The most typical and regrettable examples, in my opinion, are two:

First:
The once-popular privacy protocol $TAC , since it launched a token, the primary issue is trading. If it solves the smoothness and convenience of trading and grows the community, the community can form strong consensus, and the project can continue.

But the developer of $TAC completely failed to realize this, ultimately making the voices of support fade away.

Second:
It's $BOUND . Actually, $BOUND had a community, and the community promoted it very hard, at least doing justice to the project. However, the developer completely ignored the opinions raised by the community and didn't listen to any feedback from the community! This led to a slow decline after that surge, and many in the community became disheartened! If a developer doesn't engage with the community, the project is destined not to last long. To be honest, @Bound_Exchange是个非常好的产品!! But if it continues to deviate from the community, it will definitely die out!!!

There are countless examples of BTC on-chain ecosystem projects proving that

A great developer + a great community, perfectly integrated and cooperating, can create a great project. Neither can be missing.