The market told itself a beautiful story.



In the story, the US-Iran ceasefire held, the Strait of Hormuz was unobstructed, oil tankers lined up to pass, and the war premium receded like a tide.

Oil prices dutifully fell back to $75. Everyone breathed a sigh of relief: see, peace.

Until today, the WSJ threw a pebble.

Iran attacked a cargo ship.

The first substantive reversal after the protocol was signed has arrived.

Over the past week, all geopolitical risks were pressed with the "ignore" button. The ceasefire agreement was signed, US Secretary of State Rubio also ended his Gulf tour, and issued a joint statement with the GCC, drawing three red lines: no tolls in the Strait, missile capabilities must be managed, and proxy forces must be restrained.

The market equated "red lines drawn" with "problem solved."

It's like drawing a cage for a bear and thinking it won't bite you. In reality, the bear is testing the cage lock with its claws, while you're counting your money with your back turned to it.

The truly terrifying thing about the ship attack is not how big it was, but how quickly it came.

On May 29, Iran said "permanent control of the Strait of Hormuz," and in June everyone said "the agreement is solid." How many days has it been? The ink on the agreement is barely dry, and a ship has already been attacked.

What does this show?

It shows that Iran never regarded the agreement as the final answer. It's testing the waters — testing the US reaction, testing market sensitivity, testing how the market will react after oil prices have already fallen 11% from the peak, by creating another shock.

During the peak of the conflict in April-May, Brent briefly hit the $88-90 range, which included roughly $10-12 of pure geopolitical panic premium.

Now at $75, the geopolitical premium has gone to zero.

If the ship attack is just an isolated incident, Iran denies it, and Rubio's statement has a suppressing effect — then oil prices will return to $78-80, the premium will come back by $3-5, and the market will suffer a minor pain and it's over.

But if Iran admits it, or says "this is a response to the red line statement" — then the market will immediately add back all of the previous $10 premium, and Brent will return to the $85-88 range.

So what does this have to do with the crypto circle?

It has a lot to do with it.

Aren't you staring at the Fed's rate cuts every day? If oil prices jump back to $85-88, what do you think will happen to inflation expectations? Are you still counting on rate cuts?

Bitcoin is the most sensitive thermometer among risk assets. For every $5 increase in oil prices, BTC's risk appetite has to take a step back.

If Brent really returns above $85, US stocks will fall first, and BTC will come under pressure. This transmission chain has been verified countless times in the past two years.

"The market's biggest mistake is using the pen that signed the agreement to wipe away the smell of gunpowder."#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $BZ $CL
BTC-3.32%
BZ-0.62%
CL-0.85%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned