Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
#广场预测世界杯赢40000U 2026 World Cup Prediction: Japan 1-2 Sweden
With less than 24 hours until kickoff of the decisive Group F match (at 7:00 AM Beijing time on June 26), Japan and Sweden are set to face off—not because Japan has a sure win, but because the Nordic Vikings are seeking revenge. Since it's a binary choice, why does the public favor Japan, while I think Sweden can win?
World Cup predictions, to fans, often boil down to form and rankings, but when it comes to a specific group stage elimination situation, it's more than just paper strength.
The two teams' knockout scenarios:
Japan has 4 points after two matches, with a goal difference of +4, and can advance with a draw; Sweden has only 3 points with one win and one loss, and must win to ensure direct qualification.
After the first two rounds in Group F, Japan and the Netherlands both have 4 points, Sweden has 3 points, and Tunisia with 0 points is already eliminated. For Japan, not losing secures a top-two finish in the group. For Sweden, even a draw is not safe—though they could still finish as one of the best third-placed teams, their fate would no longer be in their own hands.
In the same match, the two teams face completely different mathematical problems. Japan has more strategic room, while Sweden has almost no margin for error.
Why does Sweden have a chance instead?
The reasons for favoriting Japan are strong, but it is precisely these reasons that might give Sweden an opening.
Japan's first two performances were indeed impressive: they came from behind twice to draw with the Netherlands in the opener, then thrashed Tunisia 4-0 in the second match, setting a team record for most goals in a single World Cup match. Daichi Kamada and Ayase Ueda each scored two goals, providing ample firepower in attack. The squad has a very high proportion of Europe-based players, strict tactical discipline, and a smooth 3-4-2-1 formation.
But Sweden is not without a chance. Alexander Isak and Viktor Gyökeres form a forward duo worth over €150 million combined. Even in the 5-1 thrashing by the Netherlands, Gyökeres still had 5 shots, 3 on target, and 3 key passes, with a passing accuracy of 89.5%. A team with such attacking firepower can change the outcome of any match.
The overlooked key factor: match strategy
Japan only needs to not lose to advance, and this mindset can be a double-edged sword in practice. Some analysts suggest Japan might even theoretically lose to Sweden deliberately, finishing third in the group to avoid Brazil and Morocco. Although Japan's coach Hajime Moriyasu clearly stated the goal is to finish top of the group and not adopt a strategy that harms morale, the mentality of not losing will inevitably affect risk preferences during the match. In contrast, Sweden is backed into a corner. From 5-1 to 1-5, a dramatic swing from peak to trough in six days has left the team with no retreat. Forced to attack with full force, the combination of Isak and Gyökeres can be maximized.
Key tactical points
Sweden's heavy loss to the Netherlands exposed their deficiency in midfield ball retention. However, Japan may not be able to exploit this as effectively as the Netherlands. Against the Netherlands, Sweden lost possession repeatedly after being controlled in midfield, and the large gaps in defense were severely punished. But Asian teams find it hard to replicate the pressing intensity and physicality of top European sides against Sweden. Some analysis suggests that against Japan, Sweden will be able to advance the ball into the attacking third much more often than against the Netherlands—and once the ball reaches the attacking third, Sweden's forwards can solve problems. Japan has a defensive trap strategy of deliberately leaving space, luring opponents in, then doubling up, but the individual ability of Sweden's forwards may not easily fall into such traps.
A subtle hint from historical meetings
Japan has not beaten Sweden in nearly 90 years. The two teams have met 5 times in history, with Sweden winning 2, Japan winning 1, and 2 draws, and each team scoring 7 goals. Japan's only victory over Sweden was at the 1936 Berlin Olympics, and they have not won since in five subsequent matches. Although this history has limited relevance to the current match, Sweden does not fear Japan psychologically.
Fans often instinctively favor the team in better form, but football matches often defy expectations. Japan only needs a draw to advance, while Sweden must win—this asymmetric game structure may just produce an unexpected result.
I predict Sweden will win 2-1, putting the pressure back on Japan.