#广场预测世界杯赢40000U Bold predictions for tomorrow's four World Cup matches: Spain, Uruguay, and Egypt will win, and Iran is expected to pull off an upset

The second round of the World Cup group stage has just reached the halfway point, and the watershed for qualification has already arrived.
In tomorrow’s four matches, each game is tied to the fate of at least two teams advancing.
After the first round, traditional powerhouses are collectively slow to warm up, while new teams are showing incredible resilience.
The phrase “clearly divided in strength” is becoming less and less applicable in this World Cup.
Spain versus Saudi Arabia is a redemption match for the title contenders.
After a 0-0 draw with Cape Verde in the first round, it’s one of the most eye-catching upsets so far.
With 74% possession, 27 shots, and 11 corners, the data shows absolute dominance, yet no goals resulted.
The old problems of possession-based football, circling without penetrating, and pressing without breaking through are once again exposed under the spotlight of the World Cup.
Del Bosque’s team isn’t incapable of creating chances; it’s the finishing efficiency inside the box and the ability to adapt against dense defenses that fall short, not matching the €1.27 billion squad value.
Spain has no room for retreat in this game.
It’s not that losing means elimination, but if they can’t beat Saudi Arabia, the prospects of this European Championship winner competing for the World Cup will become a joke.
The good news is that Yamal is highly likely to start, and this 18-year-old winger is precisely the variable needed to break down the bus.
Saudi’s defense isn’t bad in discipline, but their height and turning speed make it difficult to sustain against Spain’s continuous passing, cutting, and wing interplays for 90 minutes.
The suspense has never been whether Spain can win, but how many they can win by and whether they can display convincing dominance.
Uruguay versus Cape Verde is a battle to re-establish South America’s strength.
Uruguay’s situation isn’t much better than Spain’s.
They were held 1-1 by Saudi Arabia in the first round, with Nunez missing several good chances, and their lack of midfield creativity was magnified.
This team still relies on the old tactics—crossing from the wings and aerial assaults to create threats.
Against a bus formation, there aren’t many options.
But Cape Verde is not Saudi Arabia.
This new team managed to draw with Spain largely thanks to a phenomenal performance by their goalkeeper and a tactical approach of extreme defending.
Their attacking threat is almost negligible.
Uruguay’s physicality and set-piece advantages are precisely what Cape Verde struggles to handle.
As long as Uruguay can control the rhythm and avoid rushing recklessly, winning three points is highly probable.
The only variable is time.
The later the goal, the more intense the upset flames burn.
Egypt versus New Zealand is a battle for the African newcomers to earn points.
All four teams in Group G drew in the first round, so whoever gets their first win will hold the initiative to advance.
Egypt is the strongest on paper, with Salah’s presence serving as a baseline guarantee for the team.
In their first match against Belgium, Egypt led until the second half but was eventually equalized by an own goal, which was somewhat frustrating.
But it’s also clear that this Egypt team’s defensive resilience and counterattack efficiency have improved compared to previous tournaments.
New Zealand plays a straightforward style, relying on aerial balls and physical confrontations, but their technical gap is a major weakness.
Salah’s dribbling, passing, and finishing are unmatched in this group, and as long as the midfield provides enough support, beating New Zealand is straightforward.
Winning this game would put Egypt one foot into the knockout stage.
Iran versus Belgium is the most likely match for a major upset.
No one considers Iran a favorite, but no one dares to underestimate this Persian iron cavalry.
In the first round, Iran came from behind twice to draw with New Zealand, demonstrating strong resilience and tactical discipline.
Their 5-4-1 defensive formation is airtight, with double midfielders covering extensive ground, and Taremi’s pivot role and Jahanbakhsh’s wing attacks have lethal potential.
More importantly, Iran’s experience in big tournaments is top-tier among Asian teams.
Belgium’s problems are deeply ingrained.
After the golden generation’s decline, the team is in a transitional phase.
Doku’s absence has weakened their wing attack, Lukaku’s form is inconsistent, and midfield control is not what it used to be.
Their first-round draw with Egypt exposed issues of offensive ineffectiveness and sluggish rhythm.
Facing Iran’s all-out defense, Belgium might repeat Spain’s fate—dominating possession but failing to create clear chances, and being vulnerable to counterattacks.
Upsets are never just about luck.
When a team’s tactics are highly targeted, fighting spirit is at its peak, and the opponent is in poor form or riddled with internal doubts, the ground for an upset is prepared.
Iran may not win outright, but they definitely have the ability to do so.
Looking at these four matches together reveals the harsh truth of this World Cup.
The advantage of traditional powerhouses is rapidly diminishing.
It’s not that their strength is declining; it’s that weaker teams’ tactical literacy, physical condition, and execution are catching up.
Parking the bus is no longer a compromise for the weak but a carefully calculated optimal solution.
The gap in goalkeeping ability is narrowing, the maturity of defensive systems is leveling, and with VAR making refereeing fairer, the cost for underdogs to hold a draw or steal a win is decreasing.
On a deeper level, the homogenization of youth training is erasing the stylistic divide in football.
Spain’s possession-based passing is no longer exclusive, Germany’s high pressing is now learned worldwide, South American teams’ technical advantages are shrinking, and their physical disadvantages are becoming more apparent.
When all teams build their squads based on the same modern football template, top teams relying on talent to crush opponents will face increasing difficulty.
The World Cup expanding to 48 teams is not just about the tournament size but about the entire ecosystem.
In the past, group stage matches often had two or three “easy” games, but now every game is fought to the last minute.
The margin for error for strong teams is shrinking, and upsets will become more common.
It’s not that the World Cup level is declining; the football gap is truly narrowing.
After this round, the qualification picture in two groups will be roughly set.
If Spain and Uruguay both win in Group H, they will be tied at 4 points, and their final match will be a direct showdown for the top spot.
Saudi Arabia and Cape Verde will then face a do-or-die battle, with the winner having a chance to advance as the best third-placed team, while the loser will likely be eliminated early.
Group G’s situation will be even more chaotic.
If Egypt wins and Iran pulls off an upset for three points, Egypt will lead with 4 points, with Iran close behind.
Belgium and New Zealand will be pushed to the brink.
In the final round, Belgium will face Egypt, and Iran will play New Zealand, with a potential for a dramatic points reversal at any moment.
In the coming week, the group stage will enter its final phase, with more life-and-death battles and plot twists to follow.
The form of key players like Salah, Yamal, and Nunez will not only determine how far their teams go but also become some of the most watched topics of this World Cup.
The upsets in the first round were surprises; the results of the second round are the answers.
As for whether there will be new surprises tomorrow, no one can guarantee.
Because in the World Cup, the moment you think you’re safe is often when the variables begin.