Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
WSJ: Polymarket Paid Creators to Stage $1.9M in Fake Bets
Polymarket is facing serious scrutiny after a Wall Street Journal investigation. It alleged the prediction market platform paid social media creators to stage fake betting activity designed to pull in new users. According to the report, more than 1,100 videos posted across TikTok, YouTube and Instagram showed creators appearing to place large wagers and walk away with massive profits
The catch: the Journal claims none of those trades were real. The story has quickly become one of the most discussed pieces of crypto news today. It is reigniting uncomfortable conversations about transparency in crypto marketing.
Fake Trades, Real Views
The investigation alleged that creators were using near-identical copies of the Polymarket website rather than the actual platform. This made staged wins look convincingly authentic. Influencers appeared to pocket life-changing sums, including six-figure payouts tied to political and current-event predictions.
Creators were reportedly paid around $2,000 to $3,000 per month to produce the content. The Journal’s analysis put the total simulated wagers at nearly $1.9 million. More damning still: many of the featured “winning” bets would reportedly have lost money on the real platform. Together, the videos racked up more than 140 million views, reaching enormous audiences, particularly younger users.
Marketing Practices Under the Spotlight
The report also alleged that some creators were instructed not to disclose their paid relationship with Polymarket. It’s a potential violation of U.S. advertising regulations that generally require influencers to reveal sponsored partnerships. Several creators reportedly added disclosure language to their profiles only after the investigation went public. The timing is awkward for Polymarket, which has grown into one of the most recognized names in prediction markets. Despite facing regulatory restrictions in the United States.
Polymarket Promises Review
In response to the controversy, Polymarket news updates indicate the company plans to conduct a review of its promotional content and marketing practices. The company has not publicly admitted wrongdoing. But reportedly said it will audit active promotional campaigns to ensure compliance with internal standards.
For users, the episode serves as a reminder that viral social media content does not always reflect real-world trading results. As prediction markets continue to grow in popularity. Transparency around influencer marketing and user acquisition strategies may become an increasingly important issue for regulators, platforms and participants alike. The broader lesson is simple. When extraordinary profits appear online, investors should always verify the facts before assuming the results are real.