$LAB Bridges are in trouble again. Security has never been just empty talk.



The latest incident with Axelar once again rings the alarm: in on-chain ecosystems, security is not a static issue that can be passed once and be immune for life. During a bull market, the spotlight always chases the profit curve, but whether profits can truly be realized depends precisely on the resilience of the underlying risk control. Every time a cross-chain bridge, smart contract, or core protocol reveals a vulnerability, the market is forced to reassess the premium of "trust."

Now, when I evaluate projects, beyond popularity, I focus more on the redundancy design of infrastructure and emergency response capabilities. As for cross-chain bridges—are you still using them frequently now? Conan, keep going, ending with xQBt.
LAB26.33%
View Original
post-image
post-image
[The user has shared his/her trading data. Go to the App to view more.]
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned