Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Aave endured a $8.45 billion withdrawal wave during the rsETH crisis, reigniting debates over DeFi's risk management capabilities.
This crisis was triggered by an attack on KelpDAO's LayerZero cross-chain bridge, resulting in the theft of about $292 million worth of rsETH, raising concerns about the collateral value and solvency of rsETH.
Since rsETH is widely used as collateral in protocols like Aave, the risk quickly spread, leading to concentrated withdrawals by users, with some markets reaching 100% utilization, and some users unable to withdraw funds immediately.
In response to liquidity pressure, Aave’s risk management team activated emergency freeze and parameter adjustment mechanisms to limit risk propagation.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov regarded this incident as a sign of increased maturity in DeFi, believing that the protocol continued to operate as designed under extreme stress, demonstrating the resilience of an on-chain transparent, rule-based system.
However, several independent analysts pointed out that while Aave avoided systemic collapse, the event exposed ongoing risks in DeFi lending systems, including concentration risk, liquidity risk, and contagion risk due to high interconnectedness among protocols.
The behavior of large borrowers could have an impact on the entire system’s stability that exceeds model expectations.
Aave currently employs multiple protective measures such as Loan-to-Value (LTV) limits, liquidation thresholds, supply caps, borrowing caps, Isolation Mode, E-Mode, and governance mechanisms to control risk.
These mechanisms played a role in this crisis overall, but observers believe that governance response speed and risk models still need further optimization to better handle future unknown systemic shocks.
Analysts believe that this incident shows DeFi protocols can withstand large-scale runs without external aid, but a single stress test cannot fully prove system security.
As composability among protocols continues to increase, an issue with an external asset or cross-chain bridge could quickly escalate into a liquidity crisis across the entire ecosystem.