Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
$MORPHO has shown tremendous growth this year, climbing to $7B in TVL.
But what's interesting is that $AAVE and $SYRUP are quietly leading the segment across several metrics.
Let's compare $AAVE vs $MORPHO vs $SYRUP on everything that counts, leading and lagging indicators.👇
➨ LEADING INDICATORS (what moves before the price does)
1⃣Utilization Rate (how hard each deposit base actually works)
SYRUP: 46.7%
AAVE: 44.2%
MORPHO: 34.5%
Maple runs the tightest book in the category. Nearly half its deposits are actively lent out. Morpho's lower number is structural, its curator-driven markets don't deploy all liquidity at once.
2⃣Net Deposit Flows (30d)
SYRUP: +0.8%
MORPHO: −6.5%
AAVE: −7.7%
Maple is the only one of the three taking in capital right now. Aave and Morpho are contracting in near-lockstep, which reads as market-wide deleveraging, not a problem with either protocol.
3⃣ Revenue Mix (who actually gets the fees)
AAVE: 87% to LPs, 13% to protocol
SYRUP: 88% to LPs, 12% to protocol
MORPHO: 100% to LPs, 0% to protocol
Morpho keeps nothing for its treasury. The fee switch isn't on yet. Excellent for depositors. Hollow for token holders, for now. Hold that thought.
➨ LAGGING INDICATORS (what confirms a move already happened)
4⃣Fees Generated (30d / annualized)
AAVE: $41.1M / $938.9M
MORPHO: $19.7M / $205.0M
SYRUP: $9.2M / $103.6M
Aave isn't just leading here, it's printing ~5x Maple. But watch the direction: fee growth is Maple +28%, Morpho +28%, Aave roughly flat (the ugly −40% headline is distorted by a one-off May 6 liquidation spike in the prior window). The smaller two are compounding.
5⃣TVL
AAVE: $12.80B
MORPHO: $6.91B
SYRUP: $2.08B
Aave still holds ~2x Morpho and ~6x Maple. Size is real.
6⃣Market Cap & Valuation
AAVE: $1.11B mcap, 1.2x price-to-fees
MORPHO: $1.26B mcap, 6.2x price-to-fees
SYRUP: $161M mcap, 1.6x price-to-fees
Which of these DeFi lending projects are you backing for the rest of 2026? 🤔