Peter Thiel’s Occult Society Dark Rating Exposed: the big names are ranked from top to bottom—C grade is the highest, A grade is at the bottom—prices are discounted based on fame

According to Beating Monitoring, based on an analysis of the latest leaked data by WIRED, an esoteric society called Dialog, co-founded by Peter Thiel, has inside it an exceptionally cold-blooded and clearly biased “grading and elimination” mechanism.

Dialog follows a covert rule of “rating upon entry.” Although the club has thousands of members, the leak that was obtained by WIRED for review contains only 192 personal files that the club kept internally—covering 130 official members and some candidates. They reveal the club’s counterintuitive hierarchy of disdain: C-level is the highest VIP tier, B-level accounts for the vast majority of the ordinary tier, and the so-called best A-level—usually regarded as the top tier—turns out to be the lowest-profile fringe tier at the bottom.

This rating is directly tied to members’ wallets. Only about 25% of VIP “C”-level bigwigs are required to pay the full participation fee, while among the bottom “A”-level members, the proportion of those who pay tens of thousands of dollars in fees in full reaches as high as 70%.

What’s especially comical is that the AI filtering mechanism introduced by Dialog is extremely superstitious about so-called “mainstream national recognition.” For example, actor Josh Brolin, who played Thanos, has never attended a meeting, yet he still “wins” VIP “C” status outright based on movie box office and millions of fans. Meanwhile, academic luminary Tyler Cowen was judged by the AI as “not famous enough among ordinary people” and was nearly classified into the ordinary tier—only to be barely elevated to C-level through manual intervention.

As for “value points,” they are the scythe used to weed out the “useless,” specifically measuring how much a member connects the club’s other big names to resources and contributes intellectually. After each gathering, staff will debrief members’ performance as if they were “auditing code.” Anyone with value points that are too low, a poor cultural fit, or a dwindling voice and slipping influence will be ruthlessly removed from the invitation list.

In addition, the leaked database also exposed its built-in social and dating matching system (10% of members join the singles pool). While the algorithm recommends matches, it also includes a “no-pairing list.”

This so-called objective evaluation system is also packed with bias: women make up one-third of the members, yet they receive only 18% of VIP seats. Politically, it is even harder to escape discriminatory treatment. Although more than half of the members claim to be “left-leaning,” the probability of “right-wing” members receiving VIP status is more than double that of left-leaning members. Even an environmental big shot’s “left-leaning” label was forcibly rewritten by staff in the backend as “right-wing.”