KAST. EtherFi. Tria. Karta. Avici. 200+ programs globally.


They don’t share a brand layer. They share an infrastructure layer: @raincards.
$2.4B+ annualized transaction volume.
30x card base growth in 12 months.
Direct Visa + Mastercard principal membership; only crypto native issuer with both.
Operational in 150+ countries.
Most users never see it. They see the card brand in their wallet.
But the flow is the same:
Wallet → network → issuing layer → settlement.
Rain sits in the issuing + settlement layer for most of these programs.
The structural edge is not branding. It’s settlement architecture.
Rain runs stablecoin settlement.
That changes the constraint set:
Card programs can settle on weekends and holidays.
Trapped capital drops by 40%.
Fiat-native issuers on T+2 rails can’t replicate that without changing their core systems.
It’s not a feature gap. It’s an architecture gap.
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned