Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
#RWA突破430亿,Ondo联手韩国资管上链,赛道会怎么演进?从债券代币化到ETF上链,RWA的边界在快速扩张。Ondo这次牵手韩国资管公司,传统机构终于大踏步上链了。
But players like Mirae Asset are truly concerned with compliant channels and settlement efficiency, not decentralization itself. Will the influx of Korean capital push RWA toward a "more compliant, more centralized" direction, or will it accept the native rules of on-chain assets?
As an old hand, I see that Korean capital is most likely to steer RWA toward a more compliant, more centralized direction.
They want something that is regulated, auditable, and can interface with traditional settlement systems, rather than the pure DeFi approach of "code is law." This means that in the future, mainstream players in the RWA track will increasingly resemble "on-chain branches of traditional finance," rather than "extensions of decentralized finance." The scale will continue to grow, but the soul of decentralization will become increasingly thin.
This is not a question of good or bad; it’s a matter of reality: if you want to share in the big cake of institutional capital, you have to play by the rules of institutions. The future of RWA is most likely "traditional assets compliant on the chain," rather than "native new assets on the chain."