Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
The effectiveness of large model anti-distillation policies is questionable: distillation is just a shortcut for data in independent labs, and restrictions cannot prevent China's AI from catching up.
According to Beating Monitoring, regarding Washington and Anthropic's attempt to cut off China's large model "distillation" channels by blocking cutting-edge models, former GitHub International Strategy Director and Interconnected Capital founder Kevin S. Xu pointed out that adversarial distillation is only a desperate shortcut for some independent Chinese labs suffering from data scarcity. Relying on API blocking cannot fundamentally halt China's overall AI progress.
The named entities DeepSeek, Moonshade, and MiniMax are all independent labs lacking support from a group ecosystem, facing the critical issue of scarce high-quality retraining data such as reasoning steps. In contrast, large labs backed by Alibaba (Qwen), ByteDance (Seed), or Xiaomi possess massive proprietary scenario data comparable to Google and Apple, and do not rely on distillation. Therefore, blocking policies at most cause short-term setbacks for independent labs and cannot shake the foundation of China's major tech companies.
The so-called "data advantage" claimed by outsiders is a misconception: in terms of high-quality knowledge annotation and evaluation data required for training cutting-edge large models, China not only lacks advantages but is also severely deficient in mature commercial data supply chains like Scale AI or Surge. Due to the poor quality of domestic data service providers, independent labs, in despair and out of laziness to take shortcuts, have resorted to API distillation as a cheap data acquisition strategy.
However, the data annotation industry is a low-threshold commercial model issue, not a technical bottleneck like lithography machines. The domestic supply-demand gap can be easily filled. In the long run, student models trained solely by distillation cannot theoretically surpass their teachers. But since large models are still built by human engineers, whether the U.S. forcibly cuts off API channels or not, clever and diligent Chinese developers will ultimately break this upper limit, designing models that surpass their mentors. U.S. sanctions are not only ineffective but may also prematurely cut off the theoretical constraints that could keep Chinese models confined to the "student" ceiling.