Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
According to MarketWatch and a study from the University of Michigan, mutual fund management teams with different political stances outperform teams composed entirely of Republican or Democratic members. The study titled "The Cost of Political Polarization: Evidence from Mutual Fund Managers During COVID-19" analyzed three types of actively managed stock funds: funds exclusively led by Republicans, funds exclusively led by Democrats, and funds with a mixed partisan representation. From Trump’s election victory in November 2024 to May 2026, three politically themed ETFs—GOP-focused MAGA-US, Democrat-aligned DEMZ-US, and conservative ACVF-US—showed synchronized performance trends with no substantial differences. The research found that political diversity enhances cognitive flexibility in investment decision-making, while ideologically homogeneous teams face limitations, reducing the adaptability of portfolio choices and their responsiveness to market changes.