#6月3日，美國眾議院以215票對208票通過戰爭權力決議，要求川普停止對伊朗軍事行動，未經國會授權不得繼續作戰。4名共和黨議員與民主黨共同投下贊成票，係2月開戰以來首次。雖決議象徵意��

On June 3, 2026, the United States House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution with a vote of 215 to 208, directing President Donald Trump to cease military operations against Iran unless Congress formally authorizes continued hostilities. This marked the first time since the conflict began in February 2026 that the House successfully passed such a measure, with four Republican lawmakers breaking ranks to join Democrats in support.

Understanding the War Powers Resolution
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining in conflict for more than 60 days without congressional authorization. The June 3 vote represented a rare bipartisan challenge to executive war powers, reflecting growing unease within both parties regarding the prolonged Iran conflict.

The four Republican representatives who voted alongside Democrats signaled a fracture within the Republican Party regarding the administration's handling of the Middle East crisis. House Speaker Mike Johnson had previously attempted to prevent this outcome by shutting down floor action two weeks earlier when the resolution appeared poised to pass. The successful vote demonstrated that opposition to the war had reached critical mass even within the President's own party.

The Broader Context of the Iran Conflict
The military confrontation between the United States and Iran began on February 28, 2026, with joint strikes by US and Israeli forces on Iranian targets. The conflict has evolved into a complex regional crisis threatening vital global shipping lanes. The Strait of Hormuz, through which approximately 20 percent of global traded oil passes, has been largely closed to maritime traffic, creating significant disruptions to international energy markets.

The war has cost American taxpayers over 100 billion dollars according to congressional estimates and has contributed to rising living costs domestically. Energy prices have surged and inflationary pressures have mounted across the global economy, contributing to growing congressional appetite for reining in the conflict.

Immediate Market Reactions to the House Vote
Financial markets responded swiftly to the House vote, with cryptocurrency assets showing particular sensitivity to the development. Bitcoin experienced notable price movement following the resolution's passage, as markets interpreted the vote as a potential pathway toward de-escalation.

The cryptocurrency market has been closely correlated with developments in the Iran conflict throughout 2026. Bitcoin plummeted to a 2026 low of 65,834 dollars on April 3 following escalating rhetoric regarding potential military strikes. Conversely, when President Trump announced a temporary pause in strikes, Bitcoin prices spiked above 70,000 dollars, demonstrating the asset's sensitivity to geopolitical risk.

Impact on Cryptocurrency Markets
The relationship between the Iran conflict and cryptocurrency markets operates through multiple interconnected channels.
Risk-Off Sentiment and Flight to Safety
Geopolitical conflicts typically trigger risk-off behavior among investors who seek to reduce exposure to volatile assets. Cryptocurrencies remain classified as risk assets by most market participants. During periods of heightened geopolitical tension, investors tend to liquidate crypto positions in favor of assets perceived as more stable such as US Treasury bonds, gold, and cash equivalents.

The Iran conflict has been no exception. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index at times showed readings of 11, corresponding to extreme fear among market participants. This sentiment has manifested in sustained selling pressure on digital assets, with Bitcoin and Ethereum both experiencing significant drawdowns during periods of escalated hostilities.

Energy Market Spillover Effects
The Strait of Hormuz represents one of the world's most critical chokepoints for global energy supply. Disruption of this waterway has immediate implications for oil prices, which affect inflation expectations and monetary policy outlooks. Oil prices have surged repeatedly during the conflict, with Brent crude experiencing significant volatility.

These dynamics create secondary effects for cryptocurrency markets. Elevated oil prices contribute to higher inflation expectations, which can influence Federal Reserve policy decisions. Tighter monetary policy is generally viewed as negative for cryptocurrency valuations, as higher interest rates reduce the relative attractiveness of non-yielding assets like Bitcoin.

Additionally, energy costs directly impact Bitcoin mining operations. Higher energy prices squeeze mining profitability, potentially leading to reduced network security during extended periods of elevated costs. This creates a direct link between geopolitical events in the Middle East and the operational economics of cryptocurrency networks.

ETF Flows and Institutional Sentiment
The cryptocurrency market in 2026 has been heavily influenced by institutional investment flows through exchange-traded funds. Geopolitical uncertainty has contributed to ETF outflows, with sustained selling pressure from institutional investors during periods of heightened conflict.

The House vote provided a catalyst for improved institutional sentiment, suggesting a potential pathway toward conflict resolution. Market participants have monitored ETF flow data as a barometer of institutional risk appetite, with renewed inflows representing a meaningful shift in sentiment that could support price recovery.

Safe Haven Narrative and Bitcoin's Role
The Iran conflict has tested Bitcoin's narrative as a potential safe haven asset. While the cryptocurrency has not consistently behaved as a safe haven, there have been instances where it demonstrated resilience during periods of extreme uncertainty.

Bitcoin has functioned at times as both a risk asset and a potential inflation hedge, with behavior shifting based on specific geopolitical developments. Ceasefire announcements typically triggered positive price movements, while escalation led to selling pressure.

Regulatory Developments
The conflict has prompted additional regulatory actions. On June 2, 2026, the United States announced sanctions on Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Nobitex, accusing it of enabling the Iranian government to circumvent Western sanctions. The Treasury Department estimated that Nobitex processed more than 50 percent of all Iranian digital asset inflows in 2025.

This enforcement highlights the tension between cryptocurrency's borderless nature and national security concerns. Regulatory scrutiny of crypto exchanges has intensified during the conflict, creating additional compliance burdens for legitimate market participants.

Future Scenarios and Market Outlook
The passage of the House war powers resolution represents significant development, but its ultimate impact depends on subsequent political and military developments. President Trump has indicated he would likely veto any war powers resolution, and his administration has questioned the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The resolution would require a two-thirds majority in both houses to override a presidential veto.

For cryptocurrency markets, several scenarios could unfold. Successful de-escalation would likely support crypto prices by reducing geopolitical risk. Conversely, renewed hostilities could trigger another wave of selling pressure as investors retreat from risk assets.

The Strait of Hormuz remains critical. Any escalation affecting the waterway would have immediate implications for energy markets and cryptocurrency valuations. Insurance costs for shipping through the strait have already risen substantially, and further disruption would amplify market volatility.

Long-Term Implications
Beyond near-term price movements, the Iran conflict has longer-term implications for cryptocurrency adoption and regulation. The demonstrated ability of sanctioned entities to use cryptocurrency for evasion has prompted calls for enhanced regulatory frameworks.

Simultaneously, the conflict has highlighted the value proposition of decentralized financial systems in regions experiencing currency instability. This dynamic could accelerate adoption in certain markets even as regulatory pressure increases in others.

The June 3 House vote on the war powers resolution represents a watershed moment in congressional oversight of the Iran conflict with significant implications for cryptocurrency markets. The resolution's passage signals growing political pressure to end hostilities, which markets interpreted as positive for risk assets.

However, the path forward remains uncertain with potential for presidential veto and ongoing military operations. Cryptocurrency investors should remain attentive to developments in the Middle East, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz and diplomatic negotiations, as these factors will continue influencing market sentiment and price action.

The interconnected nature of geopolitical risk, energy markets, and cryptocurrency valuations means the Iran conflict will remain a key driver of crypto market dynamics until a durable resolution is achieved.