Recently, I’ve been seeing a bunch of people on testnets spamming interactions and stacking up points, and in the group, everyone keeps guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens… But I’m actually more concerned about something else: you think you’re “anonymous on-chain,” but a lot of the time you’re only replacing your name with an address—the trail is still there. When you aggregate the data, it becomes pretty clear.



My expectations for privacy right now are pretty straightforward: don’t expect instant invisibility, and don’t expect it to be completely unrelated to compliance. Put simply, on-chain privacy is like wearing a mask or looking through frosted glass—it can block some details, but if someone wants to track you, they still can. What ordinary users can do is not tie all their actions to a single address, and not keep shuttling identity information and on-chain assets back and forth along the same path—especially not to expose their behavior clearly just for that little “points” expectation.

I treat this as operational risk management: leave fewer traces if you can, but don’t fantasize about “absolute security.” Good night—I'll check the delays and slippage again tomorrow.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments