Lately, I've been a bit obsessed with DAO voting, the proposals on the surface say "optimizing incentives," but honestly, many are just redistributing who can get transaction fees/subsidies, or whose voice is more stable. I'm most worried about those that hide key parameters in attachments, or just say "to be adjusted later by the committee" and take the power away... As a security enthusiast, that makes me feel very uneasy.


Also, these days, the group is buzzing about staking unlocks, token unlock calendars, and the selling pressure anxiety is everywhere, but what I care more about is: after unlocking, will the tokens be concentrated in just a few addresses, turning voting from "community" into "office"? Anyway, before I vote, I always check the fund flow and delegation relationships. I'd rather be slow than vote blindly. How about you?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned