After I mute the group, my mind actually becomes clearer: I look fewer times at the emotions of "It's going to take off again today," and have more time to review how the treasury is actually being spent in governance proposals. To put it simply, I judge whether the project team is serious or not by whether their expenses are tied to milestones—I'm wary of projects that pay all at once; segmented funding and each phase deliverable that can be verified (even if it's just simple code updates, audit progress, user data) at least show that work is being done. Recently, with the stacking of staking and shared security benefits being criticized as "overly complex," I can understand—more layers just seem to mask simple problems: money is spent, but where are the results? Anyway, I’m less about arguing now and more about monitoring deliverables; otherwise, the treasury burns faster than I can scroll through the group.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned