Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Recently, I’ve been looking into LST/re-staking again. To put it plainly, there are only two sources of yield: one is the “normal interest” from underlying staking, and the other is the “sweetener” from various new L1/L2 incentives that pull TVL. The latter looks tasty, but it’s also the easiest to turn into the kind of “mine, stake, and sell” loop that old users love to complain about—when the incentives stop, TVL runs away faster than anyone.
The risks are pretty much two layers too: problems with the underlying chain itself, or the LST issuer/custody/redemption mechanisms getting stuck. The re-staking layer is more realistic—too much complexity in strategies plus too many permissions. If a contract has a loophole, it’s not just a case of earning a bit less; it’s a direct wipeout to zero. Anyway, I’m following a checklist right now: only touch it if I can understand the redemption path, approve the minimum permissions whenever possible, and if the returns are high to the point of being ridiculous, treat it as an ad… We’ll talk about it again next time.