Recently looking at LST and re-staking setups, it feels like splitting "interest" into several layers and selling them to you: one layer is the staking reward itself, another is the subsidy the protocol offers to attract TVL, and another is renting out your security for income. The profits, frankly, come from these pockets, but once they’re squeezed, if they can’t be extracted, people just leverage up or add complexity.



The risks are also quite straightforward: LST first faces de-pegging risk (you might want to sell but there's no one to buy), and the staking side is more about "contagion"—if the underlying fails, the upper layers get penalized, strategies blow up, one layer passes problems to the next. Plus, recently cross-chain bridges have been hacked, or oracles have wild price fluctuations, and everyone is shouting "wait for confirmation." This consensus is actually a self-protection against distrust in complex systems. Anyway, I’d rather take fewer risks now than wake up one day to find my earnings gone and end up losing money. Hmm, let’s leave it at that.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned