I'm now observing whether project teams are serious about their work, rather than just focusing on how "beautifully the roadmap is written." I prefer to see how the national treasury funds are spent, whether there are corresponding milestones after the money is used. For example, each expenditure should clearly state who it’s for, what is being done, and what the deliverables are. Over time, can the community really see the launch, audit reports, thicker documentation, bug fixes... things like that? Recently, after the cross-chain bridge was hacked again, everyone was rushing to say "wait for confirmation." I can understand that; after all, the feeling of money spent on security versus money spent on meetings/PR is completely different. Later, I found the simplest way to judge is: are they willing to break down milestones into smaller parts so you can verify at any time, and are not afraid of questions? The more they hide things, the more the treasury, no matter how big, feels empty.