Do you really think that just drawing roadmaps every day counts as “getting work done” for the project team? For my part, I’d rather see how the national treasury money is spent—and how milestones are delivered.

When it comes to treasury spending, I treat it like a recipe breakdown: the ingredients are where the money comes from (unlocks/funding/fees), the “cooking heat” is where it’s spent (development, security audits, operations, or “consultant fees”), and the time it comes out of the pan is whether the milestones actually land on the table on schedule. Worst of all are the ones who, on one hand, shout about modularization and DA layer narratives to get developers excited—while, on the other, the treasury leaks money out like a sieve. Users end up listening cluelessly and are still forced to pay.

A simple, no-nonsense self-check: once the money has gone out, can you see on-chain that the team’s addresses follow a more regular rhythm and that contract updates look more like “serving continuously,” or is it suddenly a big transfer followed by silence… In plain terms, for projects that take doing real work seriously, the bills and the speed of “getting the dishes out” will match.