Recently, people keep asking, "Is stronger on-chain privacy always better?" I feel that ordinary folks shouldn't have too high expectations. To be honest, on-chain is just a big square; no matter how much you wear sunglasses, you're not invisible. Privacy tools are certainly useful, at least don't post addresses like salary cards everywhere, but when it comes to deposits and withdrawals, platform risk control, taxes, and other issues, the compliance line will eventually come looking for you. Don't fantasize that "being anonymous = being invincible." My current expectation is: don't be too exposed with daily transfers, and if you really need to go through official channels, be honest and leave a trace—don't dig your own hole.

In the past couple of days, after that mainstream public chain upgrade, people in the group are guessing whether the ecosystem will collectively move away... I actually think whether to migrate or not isn't the point. The key is that the addresses and on-chain behaviors you hold won't suddenly become clean just because you switch chains. If you want to be safer, use separate addresses, and don't bind your identity information and main address too much. As for the rest... this is all you can do.