Last night I got a little scared: I almost used the same address for two "nothing special" activities due to a quick hand. Looking back, that on-chain privacy really isn’t something you can hide just because you want to. To put it simply, ordinary users shouldn’t expect to be completely anonymous and untraceable; it’s more about "not letting strangers see through at a glance." But if compliance tracing or exchange risk control kicks in, the connections can still be pieced together slowly.



So my current expectation is very realistic: keep the source of funds, destination, and interaction partners as clean as possible, avoid gray areas, and don’t fool yourself into thinking "just a little wash makes it safe." Also, during that extreme period of high funding rates, whether the group argued about reversing or continuing to squeeze the bubble, I was actually more worried about my own emotions leading me to switch paths recklessly or sign transactions randomly... Impatient people really need to exercise restraint, so that’s how I’ll proceed for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments