I’ve been lurking for a long time, but I still can’t resist popping in: when you say “just do a cross-chain,” what you’re really asking is, “who am I supposed to trust this time?”



IBC sounds very elegant, but once a message is sent, you need to trust at least two blockchains themselves not to act up, the light client/verification logic not to be written incorrectly, and the relayer not to mess around (it doesn’t steal your money, but it can make you doubt everything and question your life). And then there’s also the receiving-side contract/module—no buried landmines there either.

If you switch to those “bridges,” it’s even more intense: multi-signatures, oracles, custody, upgrade permissions… any point where your mindset breaks can instantly turn into a charity donation.

Recently, the same collapse in chain gaming—its inflation + studios + a spiral crash in coin prices—doesn’t that also have the same flavor as “the trust chain is too long, and the profits are too sweet”?

Anyway, before I cross-chain now, I check permissions and upgrade loopholes first. I’d rather do it slower and pay more, and have fewer dreams.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments