Recently, AI agents interacting on-chain have been a hot topic, and my first thought is: which gears are most likely to get stuck. Reading smart contracts can be automated, but the step of “understanding the risks” still feels like it needs human oversight—such as authorization limits, upgradeable contracts, how close liquidation lines are—if these are written incorrectly, it’s not a bug, it’s a direct wipeout. And then there’s the whole transaction path / slippage / MEV situation—basically, agents can be fed fake quotes, and in the end, someone still needs to press confirm before critical actions, or it’s like handing the keys to autopilot.

As for social mining, fan tokens, and that “attention as mining” approach, I admit I’m a bit slow on the uptake… Everyone’s arguing about parameters while I’m still looking at the specs. It feels like attention is more like a noise source—lively but noisy. Even if you turn the liquidation valve in the contract, it still rings. Anyway, I now trust “manual final review” more—don’t let agents do irreversible things for you.