Polymarket's ruling gave me a headache; selling coins in May only learned about it in June, so is the on-chain timestamp just for show? The four major accounts control 7 million votes, and the decentralized oracle has turned into a boardroom vote.

View Original
CoinNetwork
Polymarket: Recent Bitcoin sales strategy sparks controversy
Polymarket disagreements over May/June contracts: the ruling of "no" for May and "yes" for June was caused by controversy over the strategy company's sale of 32 bitcoins from May 26 to 31.
Traders claimed they sold before the deadline, while some said it was only considered after it was publicly disclosed on June 1.
UMA token holders supported the latter, resulting in traders who sold bitcoins before May 31 suffering losses.
The four major holders control about 7 million voting rights, far exceeding the opposition.
Galaxy Research strongly opposed, advocating for the sale timing to determine the outcome.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned