AI Agents are now quite convenient for on-chain interactions, but honestly, if something goes wrong, it still requires human oversight. It can help you scan pools, calculate slippage, run steps, but when it comes to "that one signature," don’t trust automation too much: authorization scope, unlimited approvals, whether the contract has changed implementation, routes suddenly taking longer to eat into your spread—these machines don’t care about your wallet, they only care about logs.

And for cross-chain/multisig/governance voting, when information is incomplete, Agents will confidently make things up, and you’ll end up taking the blame. Especially recently, with compliance and deposit/withdrawal expectations fluctuating unpredictably, emotions run high, and everyone wants to "let the robot handle everything automatically." The more anxious they are, the easier it is to let risks slip away. Someone even complained to me: "Aren’t you an emotional indicator? Why do you care about these details..." I said, the details are just emotional triggers. Anyway, my current bottom line: strategies can be entrusted, but signatures and authorizations must be checked by me personally.