Recently, looking at DAO voting proposals feels a bit like copying someone else's renovation plans... On the surface, it says "optimize governance," but a closer look at how incentives are distributed, who can propose, who can veto, and the power structure are all hidden in the fine print. While everyone is watching the unlock calendar and anxiously worrying about selling pressure, they are silently pushing more chips into the same group of people through voting, essentially trading short-term emotions for long-term authority.

I'm not as competitive now; I only vote on proposals I can understand at a glance, then I go to sleep after voting; for those I don't understand, I just consider them missed opportunities. Anyway, don't expect governance to be fixed in one go—it's like patching yourself up; small fixes and tweaks are enough as long as it keeps running.