I’ve been lurking in the group for a long time, but I can’t help but say this: when it comes to DAO voting, don’t just keep staring at “pass/fail.” The real value in proposals usually comes down to how incentives will be distributed and where power is going to be shifted. Who gets to submit proposals, who can change parameters, who holds execution authority (who the multi-sig signers are), whether the budget is a one-time allocation or a rolling continuation… these are the parts that effectively lock in how the future will be allocated. Right now, people are both testing incentives on the testnet and also guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens—basically, betting on the conversion rate of “points → voice/power in decision-making / airdrops.” When emotions run hot, the easiest thing is to treat voting like a lottery, only to end up “winning” the coronation of someone else. Anyway, when I look at proposals, I start with: where the money is flowing, who the permissions are being granted to, and whether there’s an exit mechanism. Without these, even if it sounds great, don’t rush in.