Recently, people have been talking about on-chain privacy, and honestly, I’m pretty conflicted. I’m just a regular user—I want to make sure I’m not having every single transfer tied to my name, but I also can’t expect the fairy tale of “completely anonymous and fully compliant” to keep existing forever. Once on-chain addresses are linked to real-world identities, no matter how many wallets you switch or how many detours you take later, the traces are still there—at most, it just becomes more expensive and slower to chase them.



The whole modular and DA-layer approach has been getting developers excited lately, and I’m a bit confused by it too… but my intuition is: where the data is stored, how long it’s kept, and whether it can be linked will ultimately turn into the tug-of-war between compliance and privacy. For now, my expectation is this: privacy tools can be used, but don’t treat them like magic; when dealing with big exchanges or fiat on/off-ramps, the required proof will still be needed. What I can do is: don’t put all my assets on the same trail, and don’t click unknown links—just that for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned