Recently reviewed several DAO proposals, and the more I look, the more I realize that voting is not just "approve/reject"; what’s actually hidden in the proposals are incentive distribution and power structures: who can propose, who can change parameters, whether voting rights are based on tokens or lock-up duration, and even whether "voting has subsidies or not" can influence people to vote, or simply turn voting into a check-in for airdrops... In short, the rules determine where the power lies. Plus, with some regions tightening or loosening regulations on taxes and compliance lately, people's expectations for deposits and withdrawals are shifting, and so are voting participation and stances—it's quite realistic. The group chat is also interesting; some only look at "how much I can get," while others argue over permission boundaries for a long time. I usually just first identify who benefits from the proposal and who takes the blame, and don’t get too excited about the rest.