A 75% preference rate is quite interesting—while the law professor says they want critical thinking, their actions are honestly choosing AI for its clarity. Still, this also shows that prompt engineering has already found a way into the legal vertical. Next, we’ll see whether case law retrieval and contract generation can also “keep up” and reach this same standard.

View Original
CoinNetwork
CryptoWorld News reports that a study published by Polymarket shows that research from Stanford University found that law professors prefer AI-generated tutoring answers in 75% of cases, rather than answers written by professors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned