AI Agents are pretty popular right now, but I always feel that even if they can “interact on-chain,” they still can’t do without human backup. To put it bluntly, the most deadly part is the authorization step: how much quota to grant, to whom, and whether it’s unlimited authorization. Agents can easily open up all the risk just to “complete the task.” And with cross-chain/coin swaps—slippage, routing, counterfeit coins with the same name—you can’t just let it “pretend to be dead” with you if something goes wrong.



Actually, when a mainstream public chain upgrades or around the time of a hard fork, everyone starts guessing whether projects will migrate. That’s why I don’t dare fully automate it: the chain state is unstable, the RPC is acting up, and delays happen on the bridge side. The Agent might still rush in and submit transactions, and in the end, you only see a bunch of failed fees. Anyway, my current approach is: it handles finding opportunities and calculating routes, while humans handle the final confirmation, quota management, and who holds the stop-loss button… it’s safer, and I can sleep at night.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned