These task platforms are really starting to feel more like working: checking in, posting tweets, recruiting people, filling out forms, waiting for ratings, and in the end, getting cut off by the "witch." Honestly, platforms are also afraid of being exploited, but their scoring models are black boxes, forcing normal users to act like robots with standardized operations, making it more and more exhausting.

From my perspective, anti-witch measures are often just anti-"anomalies." If your behavior is too much like an efficiency tool (mass wallets, interactions during the same time period, paths that are too clean), you’re easily misjudged; but if you deliberately act "like a human," it wastes time, and all the costs are passed on to the user. It’s quite cynical: turning earning from exploiting information gaps into a matter of labor hours and acting skills.

Recently, some people have been comparing RWA and US Treasury yields to on-chain yield products, talking as if choosing one can let you relax… but the biggest uncertainty on the blockchain side has never been interest rates, but rules and enforcement (contracts, liquidation, ordering, platforms changing their stance at any time). Interest is written on the page, but the risks are hidden in the fine print.

I’ll first diversify the recent common wallet behaviors and slightly dirty up a few interaction paths, then test the platform scoring again tomorrow. That’s all for now.