Recently, project teams have been posting a bunch of GitHub links, audit reports, and "upgrades handled via multi-signature," and I feel like many beginners (including myself) are actually looking for a sense of "trustworthiness." To put it simply, I first check whether they are continuously updating, or if they only become active right before issuing tokens; don't blindly trust audit reports either—look for clear explanations of how high-risk issues are handled or fixed, and don't just screenshot a "pass" as a talisman.

I used to think multi-signature was safe once set up, but I later realized that the key is who the signers are, how many people there are, whether they can be replaced, and if there are delays. Recently, everyone has been discussing the pressure from staking unlocks and unlock schedules, but actually, during such times, it's easier to be comforted by phrases like "we are very safe and transparent"... Anyway, I’m just taking it slow now, observing for a few more days, and not rushing to place trust.