Recently, I came across news about cross-chain bridges being hacked again, and my mood was as gloomy as rain—suddenly feeling damp. To be honest, my expectations for "on-chain privacy" aren't that romantic anymore: what you can hide are the daily activities behind the address, not that you'll never be tracked. Compliance is also quite a practical line; if something really happens, platforms and on-chain data will still cooperate as needed. Ordinary people shouldn't treat "anonymity" as a protective talisman.



A few days ago, during the abnormal price feed incident with the oracle, everyone was waiting for "confirmation," but I actually think this is a more mature consensus: take it slow, there's no shame in that. The boundaries between privacy and compliance are probably similar—don't expect perfect one-step solutions; instead, add an extra layer of buffer when necessary. Anyway, my current approach is to avoid crossing unfamiliar bridges and avoid signing permissions I don't understand; if I really need to act, I’ll first... wait for confirmation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned