These days, I've been seeing everyone talk about re-staking and shared security.

Basically, it's lending out the "security endorsement" of the same asset multiple times, with the returns seeming to stack up, but the risks also accumulate.
The only difference is that the panel won't give you a bold warning.
I've seen a lot of protocol forks/migrations, and what I fear most is changing parameters or penalty rules, which instantly turn the previously calculated "annualized" returns into just psychological comfort.

Airdrop season + point system also feels similar: task platforms pushing anti-witch hunts make it as competitive as clocking in for work,
and in the end, you think you're stacking returns, but you're actually stacking expectations.
I'm just someone making comparison tables.
Recently, the approach has been to first write out the "worst-case loss," and if you can accept it, then proceed.
Otherwise, just pretend you didn't see it...
Let's leave it at that for now.