Stop asking, “Should I use a hardware wallet?” Ask yourself first: if you lose this amount of assets, will you be unable to sleep? If you’re still carelessly clicking links on-chain with only a few thousand dollars, don’t pretend—treat your commonly used hot wallet like petty cash, tighten permissions, and don’t grant unlimited authorizations. When you start thinking, “If this money is gone, I’ll be miserable for a week,” then it’s time for a hardware wallet—at least isolate the big chunk and don’t use your main holdings to go gambling on shitcoins every day.



Once your assets are big enough that you no longer trust yourself not to fat-finger, multi-signature is a better fit: not because it’s cooler, but because it spreads out the probability of making stupid mistakes. The downsides are real too: it’s troublesome, slow, and you’ll probably get lazy. Restoring “social trust” sounds gentle, but let’s be honest—it shifts trust from yourself to “other people.” Picking the wrong person is even worse than losing your seed phrase.

Lately, the group has been arguing like crazy about the compliance boundaries for privacy coins/mixers. I just want to say: don’t use “privacy freedom” as an excuse to cut corners. If you can’t even get your backups and separate funds set up properly, what boundaries are you even talking about? Forget it—let’s not discuss it now. Tonight, go through your seed-phrase backups and permissions again.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned