Last night before bed, I looked at a DAO proposal, seemingly about "optimizing the budget," but in reality, every line was about incentives: who can get continuous subsidies, who can nominate multi-signatures, who can decide the rules for the next distribution. Frankly, voting isn't about right or wrong; it's more about confirming which side of the power structure is leaning slightly.

Recently, Meme and celebrity endorsements have gone in circles again, and veteran members in the group advise newcomers not to take the final step. I think it's similar to a DAO: once attention is focused, people tend to forget to look at the rules themselves. Anyway, the first thing I look at in a proposal isn't the slogan, but "how the money is distributed," "who has the permissions," and "who bears the exit costs." Everything else can be put aside for now.