I'm currently looking at the project "Trustworthy or Not," and I’m mainly ignoring the K-line charts for now, focusing on two things first: GitHub and the audit report. GitHub isn’t about how many stars it has (that can be faked); I care more about whether there have been continuous commits recently and whether the key changes are clearly documented. Don’t just upgrade and slap on a bunch of “refactor” commits to brush it off. As for the audit report, don’t just look at the cover logo—pay attention to whether it has a clear scope/version number, whether the identified issues are marked as “fixed” or “accepted risk,” and whether there’s a re-review after fixes… Basically, see if they’ve explained the risks clearly.

I’m also especially sensitive about upgrades to multi-signature setups: who can sign, what the threshold is, whether there are time locks or delayed activation. Without delays, no matter how much they talk about “decentralization,” I’ll just assume they can change the rules with a single click at any time.

Recently, everyone’s been arguing about staking unlocks and the unlock calendar causing sell-off anxiety, so I won’t impulsively place orders either. I’ll review these basic details first, sleep on it, and if I still want to buy the next day, I’ll buy—at least not when I’m emotionally at my highest.