Recently, we've been discussing on-chain privacy and compliance boundaries again. My expectations have already been lowered to the level of "don't be too naive"... Frankly, on-chain isn't a social circle; it's a notice board. Not sharing your address or ID doesn't mean you're invisible. If someone really wants to target you, they can piece together some clues.

But I also don't want to go to the extent of "completely exposing myself and letting anyone investigate," I don't need to be understood, I just hope to have some choice: which transactions I am willing to make public, and which are just traces of my personal life. Don't always use "compliance" as a universal key.

Whenever a cross-chain bridge gets hacked, everyone starts collectively learning to "wait for confirmation," and when an oracle reports an outrageous price, people hold back for a few blocks before acting... I now live by this logic: avoid cross-chain transfers when possible, diversify when possible, don't treat privacy as a shield, and don't see compliance as an umbrella of protection. Anyway, I tend to be a contrarian indicator when impulsive, so for now, that's how I'll proceed.