Just finished reading a DAO proposal. On the surface, it sounds pretty righteous: boost participation and provide voting rewards. Let’s be real—it's about stuffing incentives into the rules. Who gets subsidies, who can make proposals, and who can veto: the power structure is set quietly like that.



Now when I see “vote mining,” I get a bit of PTSD. It feels pretty similar to the kind of inflation tactic used in blockchain games to lure people in—once the studios move in, the numbers look great, but in the end it turns into a spiral in the token price, and retail investors end up acting as fuel… I’m not exactly that noble either. A few times, for those rewards, I was so eager my hand shook and I hit “like.” Only after going back through everything did I realize I’d just been helping someone else raise their sails.

There are plenty of tutorials, but I actually want to see breakdowns that, in plain language, explain things like permissions, where the treasury funds go, and who is really profiting. At the very least, that would help me avoid FOMO once. That’s it for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned