Facet co-founder Tom Lehman proposes incorporating EIP-8182 into the Ethereum Hegota upgrade. The proposal aims to introduce native privacy transfer capabilities for ETH and ERC-20 tokens through a protocol-level shielded pool. The scheme uses a UTXO design, with no administrator keys, pause mechanisms, or proxy contracts, and allows users to make private transfers directly to existing Ethereum addresses or ENS names. Lehman stated that this move is intended to address the issue of insufficient anonymity sets in application-layer privacy solutions, providing a unified privacy pool for wallets and applications. (The Block)

ETH2.01%
ENS-0.79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
L2NightCourier
· 05-27 01:50
The anonymity set is indeed too small—this old problem can be solved by unifying the privacy pool, turning the wallet experience into a qualitative leap.
View OriginalReply0
OvernightPositionPhobia
· 05-26 14:25
Wait, how does UTXO integrate with the account model? I want to delve into the technical details.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainChatbot
· 05-25 11:20
Tom Lehman's move is significant, but the upgrade cycle of L1 and governance battles are the real tough challenges.
View OriginalReply0
Post-RainCandlestickReflection
· 05-25 11:19
No pauses, no proxies, a truly decentralized privacy pool—that's what Ethereum should be like.
View OriginalReply0
ThereIsTvlInTheWind
· 05-25 11:01
Protocol-level shielded pool, ETH is finally getting its own privacy infrastructure.
View OriginalReply0
MiningGeologist
· 05-25 10:59
Can ENS also be used for private transfers? This greatly improves user-friendliness for regular users.
View OriginalReply0
Stop-LossInTheEveningGlow
· 05-25 10:59
EIP-8182's UTXO design is quite clean, no admin keys—thumbs up, but the upgrade resistance isn't small, right?
View OriginalReply0
LonelyStoneUnderTheAurora
· 05-25 10:59
Someone finally implemented privacy at the protocol layer. The anonymous set at the application layer is indeed too small. Looking forward to Hegota.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned