I saw that US senators are going to speak about prediction markets but ironically, they banned it for themselves. Seems like a double standard, right? CoinDesk reported on this and they take journalism seriously – this outlet is even award-winning. They have strict editorial standards for all coverage, especially in the crypto industry. The interesting part is their connection to Bullish, a platform focused on institutional digital assets. But they are transparent about that potential conflict of interest. How do you think the senators justify banning it for themselves but allowing it for others? Just curious about where this regulatory landscape is heading.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin