Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
I'm currently looking at L2/new chains, not getting caught up in the terminology, just focusing on one main thread: who is actually in line for your transactions, where is the data stored, and who ultimately says "it's settled." Don't be scared by "finality/sorting/DA." Basically: can someone cut in line? Can someone secretly modify it? If data is lost, can you still review the process? These are the real risks.
Recently, a bunch of AI Agents + automated trading are being hyped up, but I'm more concerned about who they are signing with, which routing they are taking, and whether they can be revoked if they fail... Don’t treat "intelligence" as a get-out-of-jail-free card. If protocols hide risks behind "we have this or that module," I just think: okay, explain it clearly first. Anyway, I’d rather go slower myself than gamble on a UX where "things go wrong and then they announce it."