Why can you kill people in games but not engage in pornography?

Games are used to vent anger; if you vent the urge to kill, it benefits social order. But if you vent the urge for pornography, it harms the economy.
If playing a game can solve sexual repression, then who will pay the bride price? Who will buy houses and cars?
LV babies and lipstick—who will pay for them?
So, you can slaughter in the game but not debate fiercely within the game.
Only more extreme magic can defeat magic.
In ancient times, if you could pull out your phone and play a video of Kato Eagle debating, that was a kind of magic—able to reshape space and time, even recreate scenes!
Don’t laugh at ancient people being stupid; actually, you’re just as stupid.
You see, knowing that AV is fantasy, yet your brain cells think it’s real, driving your hands to fight each other, then treating your DNA material like trash in a trash can.
For those trapped by the magic of pornography, they have only one way out: break through from within, defeat magic with magic.
Those abstinence mentors say that abstinence cures all diseases—that’s just nonsense.
Look at many cancer patients—they often don’t watch AV, don’t masturbate, and don’t mess around.
But they still die from their illnesses; when it’s time to go, they go.
It’s also because many abstinence theories are nonsense—that’s a kind of magical spell, thinking you can cure poison with poison.
Teacher Ma, I am a firm atheist; that’s why I read those crazy stories every day about “Hell of lust, abstinence to reach heaven.”
These toxic messages, once they enter my brain, cause cognitive conflicts, grab my attention, and then I have no time to enjoy AV.
At the same time, Teacher Ma, I am also a science student who can score 270 in science subjects, so I also read those seriously against biology, like “Under the surface, it’s all rotten flesh, dry bones, shit, pee, and urine.”
These contradict biological facts and make my left and right brain fight each other, helping me become a top-notch man.
It’s not just me; many people in reality want to quit porn. But! Abstinence is harmful to the economy; capitalists don’t want so many men and women to abstain.
And those articles that talk about logic, science, and use a calm, objective tone to explain abstinence—they get censored faster. Because in this era, “science” is considered absolutely correct.
And being calm and objective means being impartial, with high moral credibility.
And absolute correctness reflects that some people are absolutely wrong, leaving no way out for these bad guys. After all, “cutting off someone’s financial source is like killing their parents.”
If you speak calmly and objectively, truthfully and impartially, it’s like calling others vulgar, morally corrupt, which makes it hard for them to make money.
As Zeng Shiqiang said, if you are tall, others will seem short. Maybe you haven’t done anything wrong, but your existence makes some people appear incorrect.
So, you see, most abstinence media you see now are very stupid and full of loopholes.
It’s simply because talking about science and logic being correct makes others wrong and harms their interests.
And then, you’ll block these contents, making it hard for them to be published.
To publish and save all beings, we must deliberately not talk about science or logic.
We must go against the grain, take a curved path to save the country.
It’s like what the ancients said: “Lingnan is full of miasma,” using monsters and ghosts to scare people away from undeveloped natural forests.
Do you think ancient officials were afraid of feudal superstition?
No, ancient times also had science—like the use of the Yang element in today’s periodic table, which is based on ancient scientific theories.
Ancient technology was just low-level, not nonexistent.
But low-level science was hard for common people to understand, so officials could only use stories of ghosts and monsters to prevent them from doing dangerous things.
From a scientific perspective, undeveloped forests are “unexploitable”—they might be filled with methane, harbor potential plagues, or have no valuable resources at all, making exploration a waste of resources.
People simply couldn’t understand this. Even today, some natural reserves like Shennongjia have many “urban legends” about Yeti and monsters.
And these stories are actually good—they keep low-IQ folks away from these places.
Today’s situation is similar: using monsters and ghosts to talk about abstinence—stupid, but effective.
It helps many men stop internal conflict and stop treating their DNA like trash.
But the logic of modern and ancient dissemination is different. Ancient commoners couldn’t understand science, but modern people can.
Capital fears that people understand science, which is why they don’t allow various media to talk about it.
And we, who speak science and are naturally extremely lustful, still have to read a lot of stupid abstinence media.
This is mainly because calm, objective, rational things seem good—flawless. But that’s also why this “blank sheet of paper” is easily stained.
Neutral people are the easiest to be led astray.
You can think of a level tool like a spirit level: when the bubble is centered, a slight tilt causes it to shift.
And science, following the principle of “the great way is simple,” is very straightforward—basically, simple to explain.
Well… all principles are simple. No matter gravity, just one formula.
But the problem is, our brains are complex, and the simple truths of science boil down to just a few sentences.
Although correct, they’re hard to repeat multiple times and difficult to form stable neural pathways in our brains.
Once tempted, it’s easy to break the vow.
Conversely, those stupid abstinence theories are so dumb that they make people keep thinking about their stupidity, leaving deep impressions in our neural pathways.
Like a level that’s completely tilted to one side, even if you shift the trajectory significantly later, the bubble won’t move to the other side of the level.
Of course, if you ask me whether I believe those ridiculously stupid abstinence theories, I can tell you very confidently:
I TMD don’t believe a bit!
But! Even if I don’t believe, I will keep brainwashing myself with these idiotic ideas.
Not for anything else—because stupid theories lead people to extremes, and we, naturally lustful perverts, when going to extremes, won’t deviate much even if the trajectory shifts greatly.
Haha, it’s like defeating magic with magic—using poison to fight poison!
And it’s precisely because of this extremism that many men who abstain from porn encounter very beautiful prostitutes and resist the urge to patronize them.
And I think avoiding illegal acts like prostitution is worth promoting.