Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently looked at a few DAO proposals, on the surface talking about "optimizing governance," but flipping through the incentive clauses feels a bit like tasting a sweet aftertaste: who can get subsidies, who has voting power bonuses, who can get on the delegation list... The power structure is basically written in the detailed rules, just packaged more gently. Airdrop season + point system makes everyone compete like at work, task platforms even oppose witches, and as a result, voting becomes just "a part of completing tasks." Honestly, many people aren't expressing opinions; they're just protecting their eligibility. Anyway, now when I see the words "alignment of incentives," I pause for two seconds, first see where the money flows, who can change the rules, then click confirm.